Why is race mixing legal if incest isn't? -- LiveWire Teen Forums

Quote: from jamjardee at 1:19 am on Jan. 3, 2012

Check your numbers.

What are you talking about? Where's the mathematical error?

You keep going on and on about not compatible, not compatible but there are millions of healthy mixed-raced individuals. Obviously it's compatible.

Shitty argument. "Healthy" is subjective. The statistics show that mixed race people are not as healthy as monoracial people. You may consider them still healthy but it's a significant statistical drop, and I see no reason to knowingly do such a thing.

This has nothing to do with what you quoted.

Is your memory that bad? That's because of instead of answering that question you dodged it and said some stupid irrelevant shit. Answer the question:
"Why does it matter which races specifically were mixing when all mixed races statistically have a lower likelihood of happiness and success?"

...Snoredom. Sure. Not everyone agrees incest is bad. Sure. People commit incest all over the world. It's even legal in some countries. And in a perfect world, these people who commit incest will wait until each member is a full-fledge adult before committing incest.

So you agree that it's not universally immoral? So why should it be illegal?

... Do you not understand that people with suppressed genes don't know they have suppressed genes unless they get their DNA tested or opps create a expressed recessive gene child? Stop being dumb.

Of course I know that, but the point is those deadly genes are still in existence when inbreeding allows them to be removed from the population gene pool. With race mixing, they will stay latent and possibly one day come back up. And if they're latent, they could easily spread to 1000s of other people, just suppressed, and that would be even worse. The higher likelihood of a deleterious recessive alleles to be displayed is better for the population at whole, because it can quickly get selected against.

Your question is dumb. There's no need to dodge it.

Then answer.

Trolling: Incest is illegal, so mixed race should be illegal.
Not trolling: Monoracial individuals are in better health than mixed race individuals

I disagree with the first. The first is just saying that it's inconsistent, I personally don't believe either should be illegal, but if one is it makes no sense to have the other legal...

Trolling: "race mixing is selfish and destructive"
Not trolling: race mixing increases likelihood of negative traits

It is by that exact mechanism which makes it selfish [you care more about yourself than your child] and destructive.

Outbreeding does not stand on the same pedestal as inbreeding. As both may have negative effects, one clearly is beneficial overall.

That would be inbreeding, as it improves the health of the population at large, albeit to the expense of some individuals. However, race mixing decreases the health of the individuals, and does nothing positive to the population at large.

One promotes a genetic diversity, while the other promotes limiting the gene pool.

Correction: One undoes 10s of thousands of years of convergent evolving genes and undoes countless gene combinations that were selected for optimal health. The other strongly selects for positive traits and strongly selects against negative traits for the population at large, albeit at the expense of many individuals [the kids that get fucked up].

One promotes a life of enriching discoveries, while one promotes a life of humdrum.

Complete fucking bullshit. There is nothing enriching about race mixing. NOTHING.

One promotes choice, while one promotes selfish relations and intentions.

They both promote choice, all relationships do unless they're forced, however both are selfish to some extent while inbreeding can be seen as selfless of the whole family because it improves the gene pool at the expense of the children.

One promotes nature, another denies it.

Care to explain? In nature, animals develop scent glands or other traits that cause them to avoid race mixing. That's how the breeds came to exist in the first place. Furthermore, there are quite a few inbred populations so that's not really an argument either. Before you talk out of your ass think a little bit...

If you cannot understand this, then tough luck. Go fuck yourself, you faggot.

Understand what you fucking retard troll? None of this shit makes any sense, and you've failed to support your claims. If anyone is a troll it's you.

-------
� Every time I pwn some tard 1 point will be added under my avatar �
"Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored" -Aldous Huxley
"Equality may perhaps be a right, but no power on earth can ever turn
it into a fact" -Balzac

409 users online 262233 members 122 active today Advertise Here